The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, which included defendant's affirmative response, both by words and actions, to the undercover officer's question of whether he had drugs, and the officer's observation of a transaction between defendant and two others that the jury could reasonably have found to have been a sale of heroin. The issue of defendant's intent to sell heroin was properly placed before the jury and we find no reason to disturb its determination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.