WEISL v. POLARIS HOLDING CO.


226 A.D.2d 286 (1996)

641 N.Y.S.2d 288

Edwin Weisl, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Polaris Holding Company et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 25, 1996


We agree with the IAS Court that the prospectuses given to plaintiff at the time of purchase or several days later clearly indicated the speculative nature of the investments and risks involved, and thereby put plaintiffs on "inquiry notice" of their potential claims against defendants for misrepresenting the profitability and safety of the investments (see, Harner v Prudential Sec., 785 F.Supp. 626...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases