The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant's claim that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction of robbery in the second degree given his acquittal of robbery in the first degree is merely a "`"masked repugnancy argument"'" that defendant failed to preserve by not raising it prior to the jury's discharge (People v Smith,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.