HAUGHTON v. NAMANO, INC.

No. A96A1423.

476 S.E.2d 31 (1996)

222 Ga. App. 644

HAUGHTON et al. v. NAMANO, INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

August 30, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bowles & Bowles, Jesse G. Bowles, III, Cuthbert, for appellants.

Stokes, Lazarus & Carmichael, Marion B. Stokes, Richard J. Joseph, Atlanta, for appellee.


RUFFIN, Judge.

Namano, Inc. ("Namano") sued James and Donna Haughton for money owed for jewelry they purchased on open account, and the Haughtons counterclaimed alleging usury. The trial court granted summary judgment to Namano on its claim and on the Haughtons' counterclaim. The Haughtons appeal from that order, and for reasons which follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

The standard for a grant of summary judgment is found in Lau's Corp. v. Haskins...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases