Since a receiver had been appointed and a judgment of foreclosure and sale previously entered, without any appeal having been taken, and since the mortgage provided for an ex parte appointment of a receiver, the appointment of a second receiver after the bankruptcy court lifted the automatic stay was proper (see, RPAPL 1325 [1]; Real Property Law § 254 [10]; State St. Bank v Broadway/St. Nicholas Assocs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
UNITED CHELSEA NAT'L BANK v. RUMICAN 190 CORP.
228 A.D.2d 279 (1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 586
United Chelsea National Bank, Respondent, v. Rumican 190 Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 13, 1996
June 13, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
