HEINZ v. CHICAGO RD INVEST CO

Docket Nos. 169059, 169075.

216 Mich. App. 289 (1996)

HEINZ v. CHICAGO ROAD INVESTMENT COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 12, 1996, at 9:05 A.M.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Turner and Turner, P.C. (by Matthew L. Turner), for the plaintiffs.

O'Leary, O'Leary, Jacobs, Mattson & Perry (by John P. Jacobs), for the defendant.

Before: GRIBBS, P.J., and NEFF and J.J. McDONALD, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In Docket No. 169059, plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the circuit court awarding plaintiffs $70,034.77. The amount awarded represents the jury's verdict of $198,000, minus worker's compensation benefits received by Mr. Heinz, and then reduced by fifty percent as a result of plaintiff Robert Heinz' comparative negligence. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in reducing the jury's verdict by the amount of the worker's compensation benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases