1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 94 F.3d
  5. 94 F.3d 399 (1996)
 

THIEL v. STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN

No. 95-3442.

94 F.3d 399 (1996)

James S. THIEL and Barbara E. James, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN, Stephen L. Smay, John Albert, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Levine, Public Service Com'n of Wis. (argued), Madison, WI, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Daniel W. Hildebrand, Dewitt, Ross & Stevens, (argued), Madison, WI, for defendants-appellees.

Before BAUER, RIPPLE, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

This case represents the latest chapter in the seemingly neverending battle between Wisconsin attorneys and the Wisconsin State Bar.1 The plaintiffs, two Wisconsin attorneys, challenge the Bar's method for determining which activities the Bar may fund with compulsory dues. Specifically, they argue that Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule ("SCR") 10.03(5)(b)1 is unconstitutional because it permits the Bar to use compulsory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases