COUCHOT v. STATE LOTTERY COMM.

No. 94-1771.

74 Ohio St.3d 417 (1996)

COUCHOT ET AL., APPELLEES, v. STATE LOTTERY COMMISSION ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 7, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Gerald P. Ferguson, Raymond D. Anderson and Eric A. Pierce, for appellees.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Richard C. Farrin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant Department of Taxation.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Andrew S. Bergman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant Treasurer of State.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Nancy Rogoff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant State Lottery Commission.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

The only issues before the court are whether the relevant portions of Am.Sub.H.B. No. 111, as applied to nonresident lottery winners under the facts of this case, violate due process, interfere with interstate commerce, or constitute unlawful retroactive legislation.4

I

The court of appeals determined that Am.Sub.H.B. No. 111, as applied in this case, violates due process because Ohio lacked a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases