HELMAR v. HARSCHE


296 N.J. Super. 194 (1996)

CHERYL N. HELMAR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. WALTER HARSCHE AND WEICHERT REALTORS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS/CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 26, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry J. Wendt argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents.

Thomas N. Ganiari argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant.

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., KLEINER and COBURN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D.

Defendants Walter Harsche and Weichert Realtors appeal from a judgment entered after a jury verdict which determined that defendants had committed consumer fraud, proscribed by the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20, and were liable to plaintiff Cheryl N. Helmar for $5,450. The verdict was trebled by the judge to $16,350, as required by N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.

Plaintiff's three-count...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases