The record supports the conclusion of the IAS Court that, in denying petitioner's application for parole after the February and March hearings, respondent improperly considered factors outside the scope of Executive Law § 259-i and in violation of a prior court order. However, while we share the IAS Court's concern over respondent's failure, after three attempts, to provide petitioner with a fair hearing, the proper remedy is to remand the matter for a de novo hearing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
