Defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial by the undercover officer's testimony that prerecorded buy money is not recovered in 50% of buy and bust cases, and by the prosecutor's use of this testimony in summation to support an argument that defendant was a sophisticated drug dealer, is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review it in the interest...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
