Per Curiam.
We affirm the decision of the court of appeals for the following reasons. Like the court of appeals, we disregard appellant's propositions of law that are not related to the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.
Appellant's fourth proposition of law asserts ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The gist of the claim seems to be that appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that trial counsel was ineffective...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.