LUNGREN v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. C024367.

48 Cal.App.4th 435 (1996)

DANIEL E. LUNGREN, as Attorney General, etc., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; BILL JONES, as Secretary of State, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

August 12, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Floyd D. Shimomura, Assistant Attorney General, Linda A. Cabatic and Paul H. Dobson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Oliver S. Cox, Pamela S. Giarrizzo, Olson, Hagel, Fong, Leidigh, Waters & Fishburn, Lance H. Olson, N. Eugene Hill, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler and Jeffrey Gordon for Real Parties in Interest.


OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

Petitioner, the Attorney General of the State of California, seeks a peremptory writ of mandate directing respondent superior court to vacate its judgment entered August 2, 1996, insofar as it compels the Attorney General to revise the ballot title and ballot label for Proposition 209 consistent with the statements of respondent superior court made during the August 1, 1996, hearing to "reflect that the chief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases