1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 143 N.J.
  5. 143 N.J. 333 (1996)
 

MILOS v. EXXON CO., USA

143 N.J. 333 (1996)

671 A.2d 120

WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard V. Jones argued the cause for appellant (Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys).

Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for respondent (Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder & Montalbano, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J.Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN — 6.

Opposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases