ZIRGER v. GENERAL ACC. INS. CO.


144 N.J. 327 (1996)

676 A.2d 1065

MARTIN S. ZIRGER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 12, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy T. Konray argued the cause for appellant (Ravich, Koster, Tobin, Oleckna, Reitman & Greenstein, attorneys).

Elliott Abrutyn argued the cause for respondent (Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, attorneys; Warren Usdin, on the brief).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

The critical issue posed by this appeal is whether plaintiff's damages verdict against a third-party tortfeasor, awarded after a jury trial, collaterally estops General Accident Insurance Company (General Accident) from enforcing the arbitration clause included in the underinsured motorist (UIM) endorsement of plaintiff's automobile insurance policy. General Accident concedes that it knew of plaintiff's intention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases