1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 73 F.3d
  5. 73 F.3d 397 (1996)
 

HENDRY v. PELLAND

Nos. 94-7082, 94-7083 and 94-7084.

73 F.3d 397 (1996)

Anne P. HENDRY, et al., Appellants, v. Francis J. PELLAND and Sadur, Pelland & Rubinstein, P.C., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided January 19, 1996.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., appearing pro se, argued the cause, for appellants, with whom Anne P. Hendry and Judith V. Hendry, appearing pro se, were on the brief.

Ellen G. Draper, argued the cause, for appellees, with whom Joel M. Savits, Francis J. Pelland and Joel S. Rubinstein were on the brief.

Before: GINSBURG, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Three clients sued their former attorney and his law firm for breach of fiduciary duty, seeking punitive damages, compensatory damages, and disgorgement of the legal fees they had paid. The attorney's law firm counterclaimed for unpaid legal fees. Applying District of Columbia law, we address three district court rulings made during the jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases