1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 295 N.J.
  5. 295 N.J. Super. 173 (1996)
 

C & W OF N.J., INC. v. ALEXANDER SUMMER CO.

295 N.J. Super. 173 (1996)

684 A.2d 975

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. ALEXANDER SUMMER CO. AND UNITED JERSEY BANK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 18, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Rowe argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin & Davis, attorneys; Mr. Rowe, of counsel; Mark H. Sobel and Bruce D. Greenberg, on the brief).

Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys; Mr. Geiser, of counsel and on the brief; Paul T. Fader, on the brief).

Before Judges BAIME, PAUL G. LEVY, and BRAITHWAITE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

Cushman & Wakefield (C & W) brought this action against Alexander Summer Co. (Summer Company) and United Jersey Bank (UJB) to recover brokerage commissions and punitive damages, alleging tortious interference with contract and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. The complaint alleged that UJB utilized C & W's brokerage services to obtain leases for its new operations center...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases