Defendant claims that admission of testimony that, 12 days after the instant crimes were committed, he was arrested in the hallway of the courthouse in which the trial took place was irrelevant and prejudicial. However, inasmuch as defendant explicitly expressed his satisfaction with the limiting instructions given to the jury immediately after the testimony was elicited, the claim is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v White,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. WILSON
226 A.D.2d 241 (1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 611
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Junior Wilson, Also Known as Kevin Nesmith, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 23, 1996
April 23, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
