The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, which established that defendant knew that he was in possession of a stolen car (Penal Law §§ 165.50, 165.05 [1]). The jury properly rejected defendant's incredible testimony.
We find no error in the court's unobjected-to characterization of defendant's knowledge as a "centrally contested issue". The court's statement accurately reflected the theory of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
