1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 45 Cal.App.4th
  5. 45 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 (1996)
 

PEOPLE v. CARLSON

Docket No. BR35600.

45 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 (1996)

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH ARTHUR CARLSON, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

April 2, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bourdette & Partners and Christopher L. Haberman for Defendant and Appellant.

Gil Garcetti, District Attorney, George M. Palmer and Fred Klink, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

JOHNSON, Acting P.J.

Defendant and appellant, Keith Arthur Carlson, appeals from a judgment following his conviction for violating California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 185.5, subdivision (d)(1), which sets forth caging requirements for California native reptiles. Appellant contends, inter alia, that the regulation at issue violates both federal and California due process requirements because it is unconstitutionally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases