HONEYCREST FARMS v. BRAVE HARVESTORE SYSTEMS

No. 95-1789-FT.

200 Wis.2d 256 (1996)

546 N.W.2d 192

HONEYCREST FARMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRAVE HARVESTORE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Respondent, A. O. SMITH HARVESTORE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided February 20, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Daniel P. Murray and B. J. Hammarback of Hammarback Law Offices, S.C., of River Falls. There was oral argument by Daniel P. Murray

For the defendant-respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas D. Bell and Matthew A. Biegert of Doar, Drill & Skow, S.C., of New Richmond. There was oral argument by Matthew A. Biegert.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.


MYSE, J.

Honeycrest Farms, Inc., appeals a judgment dismissing its action against Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc., based on the trial court's determination that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Brave.1 Honeycrest contends the trial court erred when it determined that Brave did not waive the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction when Brave's first answer filed on its behalf by one of its insurers, General Casualty Insurance Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases