1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 44 Cal.App.4th
  5. 44 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 (1996)
 

PEOPLE v. STUDLEY

Docket No. Crim. 9662.

44 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1 (1996)

52 Cal. Rptr.2d 461

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM BRADDOCK STUDLEY III, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Orange.

January 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John R. Farris, Jr., and Mark D. Sutherland for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

BRICKNER, J.

This case presents the following question: where a motorist is cited, by the use of radar, for speed in excess of the state maximum speed limit on a nonlocal road with a prima facie speed limit of 50 miles per hour, and where a traffic and engineering survey is not proved at trial, do California's speed trap laws apply to compel exclusion of all evidence of speed? We hold the answer is "yes."

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases