The trial court did not denigrate defense counsel by curtailing his irrelevant, and extremely lengthy, questioning of the prosecution's witnesses. Defense counsel repeatedly pursued improper lines of questioning and ignored the court's rulings to desist, and as the court's comments were not harsh, and it specifically instructed the jury that such exchanges were not to be considered in their deliberations, defendant was not deprived of a fair trial (People v Gonzalez
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. YANOWITCH
227 A.D.2d 225 (1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 261
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alex Yanowitch, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 14, 1996
May 14, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.