WHITE v. WHITE


309 N.J. Super. 139 (1996)

MARY WHITE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT WHITE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 8, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. Laemers, argued the cause for appellant (Morris, Downing & Sherred, attorneys; Peter J. Laemers and Cynthia L. Gehring, on the brief).

Spencer A. Leeds, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges PRESSLER and HUMPHREYS.


PER CURIAM.

The husband in this divorce action appeals the trial judge's rulings on alimony, child support and distribution of his pension. The wife was awarded $400 a week in alimony. She is to pay the husband $75 a week for the support of their fifteen year old daughter.

The husband contends: (1) the alimony award was grossly excessive and based upon erroneous and unsupported findings of fact; (2) the child support award was insufficient because the judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases