1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 81 F.3d
  5. 81 F.3d 365 (1996)
 

HOFKIN v. PROVIDENT LIFE & ACC. INS. CO.

No. 95-1608.

81 F.3d 365 (1996)

Mark HOFKIN, Appellant v. PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided April 15, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan I. Lourie (argued), Law Offices of Michael Steiman, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Richard L. McMonigle, Jr., Sara J. Thomson (argued), McKissock & Hoffman, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.

Before: STAPLETON, SCIRICA, and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity action we are called upon to interpret the meaning of insurance policy language that a state statute requires to be included in all Pennsylvania insurance contracts. Plaintiff-appellant Mark Hofkin contends that language in the "Proofs of Loss" and "Legal Actions" clauses in his accident and sickness insurance policy require only that he submit adequate proofs of loss within ninety days after the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases