PEOPLE v. ANDERSON


233 A.D.2d 211 (1996)

650 N.Y.S.2d 526

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Anderson, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 19, 1996


Defendant's argument that the trial court improperly limited his ability to present a defense by precluding certain questions on cross-examination is unpreserved because he "fail[ed] to place on the record his explanation of the relevance and materiality of his proposed lines of inquiry" (People v Trinidad, 177 A.D.2d 286, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 865) and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases