Although respondents denominated the motion as one to vacate a preliminary injunction, the IAS Court correctly characterized it as one to reargue, the motion papers merely rehashing points made on the first motion and containing no new facts that were unavailable to respondents at that time, the denial of which is nonappealable (Tiffany Brokers v Rakofsky,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.