1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 80 F.3d
  5. 80 F.3d 359 (1996)
 

SUITUM v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY

No. 94-15768.

80 F.3d 359 (1996)

Bernadine SUITUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 1, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Patterson Cashill, Reno, Nevada, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Thomas Susich, Vicki E. Hartigan, Crowell, Susich, Owen & Tackes, Carson City, Nevada, for defendant-appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, District Court Judge.

PANNER, District Judge:

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Bernadine Suitum alleges that the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) committed an unconstitutional taking and violated her rights to substantive due process and equal protection when it refused to permit her to build a home on her residential lot in the Lake Tahoe Basin. The district court concluded that Suitum's claims were unripe and granted summary judgment to TRPA. We affirm.

BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases