PEOPLE v. SKINNER


232 A.D.2d 201 (1996)

648 N.Y.S.2d 76

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Skinner, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 8, 1996


There is no merit to defendant's unpreserved argument that the plea agreement was altered by the sentencing court's comments that the prosecutor and the victim's family "can and should communicate with the Parole Board" and that it would make the papers submitted by the victim's family available to the Parole Board (see, People v Saldana, 221 A.D.2d 239, 240, lv denied 87...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases