The trial court rejected the forensic expert specified and agreed upon by the parties stating only that the expert "would not qualify as this court's independent expert for the purposes of trial". While the trial court has broad discretion in this area, we find that it was an abuse of discretion to impress its own expert upon the parties without a more complete statement of its reasons. The better course herein would have been to accept the expert selected and agreed upon...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
