Initially, we affirmed, finding that the IAS Court correctly held respondents' determination to be arbitrary and capricious on the basis of overwhelming medical evidence of disability and the lack of any credible evidence to support a finding of no disability, relying upon our earlier decision in Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.