Defendant's claim that his confession should be suppressed because the police falsely advised him that all three witnesses had identified him at the lineup when only one of them had made an equivocal identification is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find that the misrepresentation made by the detective did not deny defendant due process (see, People v Ingram,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. STOKES
233 A.D.2d 194 (1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 104
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Stokes, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 19, 1996
November 19, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.