We agree with the motion court's conclusion that plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence to raise issues of fact as to whether her assailant was an intruder, rather than a guest in the building, who had gained access to the building through a broken front door, rather than through the bolted roof exit (cf., Wright v New York City Hous. Auth.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
