1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 324 S.C.
  5. 324 S.C. 101 (1996)
 

MATTER OF FENNELL

No. 24502.

324 S.C. 101 (1996)

477 S.E.2d 706

In the Matter of Edward A. FENNELL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided October 7, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorney General Charles Molony Condon and Senior Assistant Attorney General James G. Bogle, Jr., Columbia, for complainant.

Edward A. Fennell, Dublin, OH, pro se.

PER CURIAM:

In this attorney grievance matter, respondent filed neither an answer nor any evidence in mitigation. Under the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, respondent is in default and is deemed to have admitted all allegations in the three complaints served upon him.1 Para. 13 C, Rule 413, SCACR. As a result of respondent's default, no panel hearing was held on these complaints. The Executive Committee voted 6-0 to recommend respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases