BROOKS v. BROOKS


227 A.D.2d 195 (1996)

642 N.Y.S.2d 511

Michael Brooks et al., Appellants, v. Phillip Brooks et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 9, 1996


Plaintiffs do not contend that defendants undertook any express obligation to indemnify them. Liability under a theory of implied indemnity would require some wrongful conduct by defendants (see, Trustees of Columbia Univ. v Mitchell/Giurgola Assocs., 109 A.D.2d 449), and a duty owed by defendants to plaintiffs (see, Prudential-Bache Sec. v Resnick Water St. Dev. Co., 161 A.D.2d 456

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases