1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 94 F.3d
  5. 94 F.3d 325 (1996)
 

PETRILLI v. DRECHSEL

No. 95-3669.

94 F.3d 325 (1996)

Felix T. PETRILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David B. DRECHSEL, individually and as Plan Administrator of Inland Steel Company Pension Plan, and Julius M. Scheffers, as Plan Administrator of the Inland Steel Company Severance Plan, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 26, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Tecson, Daniel J. Fumagalli (argued), Fumagalli, Tecson & Brent, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lawrence L. Summers (argued), Michael I. Richardson, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before BAUER, ESCHBACH, and FLAUM, Circuit Judges.

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Felix Petrilli seeks damages under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) for his employer's decision to deny him severance and pension benefits. This is the second time his claim has been before us. After the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Plan Administrators, we remanded the case for reconsideration of Petrilli's denial of benefit claims under a de novo standard of review. Petrilli v. Drechsel,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases