Per Curiam.
In our previous opinion in this case, we held that the R.C. 149.43(A)(2)(c) work-product exception did not justify withholding the subject records because "[t]here is no evidence that criminal charges against police officers or other individuals involved in the alleged wiretapping are either `pending' or `highly probable' as required for application of the work product exception." Master, 75 Ohio St.3d at 29, 661 N.E.2d at 186; State ex...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.