1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 224 A.D.2d
  5. 224 A.D.2d 190 (1996)
 

GARCEA v. KIMAN

224 A.D.2d 190 (1996)

637 N.Y.S.2d 136

Yetta Garcea, Appellant, v. Richard Kiman et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 1, 1996

In this dental malpractice action, the trial court's jury charge on foreseeability did not constitute reversible error (see, Capuccio v City of New York, 174 A.D.2d 543, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 751). It did not affect the clear instructions concerning the duty defendants owed plaintiff, determined by the dentist-patient relationship (see, Papa v Brunswick Gen. Hosp., 132 A.D.2d 601

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases