We disagree with the motion court that respondent's concern that petitioner might permit illegal activity, or otherwise might not be able to exercise adequate control over the licensed premises, is based on mere speculation. However, we conclude that further proceedings before respondent are necessary because petitioner was not given a sufficient opportunity to confront an investigator's report upon which respondent relied in making its determination. Thereafter, the agency...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
