Since the bank's drive-through window was a permissible "operation" under the lease, and since drive-through customers must utilize driving space outside the bank building itself when approaching the window, an accident "arising out of" the "use" of that outside space would be covered by the insurance policy naming plaintiff-landlord as an additional insured. However, the record does not indicate how far the site of the accident was from the drive-through window or where...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
