Defendant's involvement as an accomplice and not merely as a passive bystander or buyer in this drug transaction was proven by legally sufficient evidence that defendant responded to the undercover officer's request for cocaine by telling her to follow him so that he could "hook [her] up"; that defendant then led the officer to a codefendant, who responded to their requests for "dimes" by telling them to wait by a telephone booth; that the codefendant then went to speak with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
