RUSSELL v. THOMAS O'CONNOR & CO.

(14714)

42 Conn. App. 345 (1996)

ARTHUR RUSSELL ET AL. v. THOMAS O'CONNOR AND COMPANY

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released July 30, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Grabow, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

John B. Farley, the appellee (defendant).

O'Connell, Foti and Schaller, JS.


SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiffs, Arthur Russell and Jeanne Russell, appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment against them. They claim that the trial court improperly concluded that their complaint was not filed within the one year time period of General Statutes § 52-593. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are undisputed. In 1989, the plaintiffs commenced an action against Natkin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases