We agree with the IAS Court that there are no issues of fact as to whether defendant property owner exercised control over the manner in which plaintiff's employer performed its work on defendant's premises. At most, the record shows only defendant's retention of general supervisory powers over the employer's work, an insufficient basis for imposing vicarious liability
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.