1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 233 A.D.2d
  5. 233 A.D.2d 151 (1996)
 

P. T. BANK CENT. ASIA v. WIDE MOTION CORP.

233 A.D.2d 151 (1996)

649 N.Y.S.2d 151

P. T. Bank Central Asia, Plaintiff, v. Wide Motion Corp. et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) P. T. Bank Central Asia, Respondent, v. Che Kei Li, Also Known as Danny Chi Kei Li, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 12, 1996

Appellant's reliance on RPAPL 1301 in support of dismissal is misplaced because the two actions commenced by respondent bank in this case do not both seek to recover a mortgage debt (see, e.g., Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v Forte, 94 A.D.2d 59), but rather a debt stemming from the principal debtor's breach of its line of credit agreement with plaintiff. RPAPL 1301 is inapplicable where, as here, the second action is on a debt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases