Defendant claims that he was denied a fair trial by the introduction of a videotaped post-arrest statement made by the co-defendant, who testified at trial. The motion court had previously ruled that this statement would be inadmissible in the event that defendant and the co-defendant were tried together, but the trial court admitted the statement on the theory that the co-defendant, in testifying, in effect, that he could not recall the incident and that whatever happened...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
