BRILLANTES v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B100434.

51 Cal.App.4th 323 (1996)

MACARIO C. BRILLANTES, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

November 27, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Marks & Brooklier, Donald B. Marks and Raymond B. Kim for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Thomas A. Temmerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Malcolm Venolia, Deputy Attorney General, for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

KITCHING, J.

In this action for mandamus relief, we consider whether a physician suspected of Medi-Cal fraud should be afforded, as a matter of right under People v. Superior Court (Bauman & Rose) (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1757 [44 Cal.Rptr.2d 734] (hereafter Bauman & Rose), a Penal Code section 1524, subdivision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases