INTERVINE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF GLOUCESTER CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND CITY OF GLOUCESTER CITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 26, 1996.
Decided May 2, 1996.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Martin S. Ettin argued the cause for appellant (Katz, Ettin, Levine, Kurzweil & Weber, attorneys; Andrew S. Genetta and Mr. Ettin, on the brief).
Barry J. Beran argued the cause for respondent City of Gloucester City Zoning Board of Adjustment (Beran & Beran, attorneys; Gail R. Beran and Mr. Beran, on the brief).
M. James Maley, Jr. argued the cause for respondent City of Gloucester City (Maley, Williamson, Hayden & Gmerek, attorneys; Mr. Maley and Charles W. Wigginton, on the brief).
Before Judges MICHELS, VILLANUEVA and KIMMELMAN.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by KIMMELMAN, J.A.D. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiff Intervine Outdoor Advertising, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the Law Division which affirmed the denial by defendant City of Gloucester City Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) of plaintiff's application for a use and bulk variance to construct three freestanding billboards on property it intends to lease adjacent to the New...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
