1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 227 A.D.2d
  5. 227 A.D.2d 132 (1996)
 

PEOPLE v. VANEGAS

227 A.D.2d 132 (1996)

641 N.Y.S.2d 304

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Omar Vanegas, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 2, 1996

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), it was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of the crimes of which he was convicted. It was not necessary for the People to introduce the proceeds of the robbery or the weapon used to commit it in order to prove defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Washington, 191 A.D.2d 278

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases