1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 292 N.J.
  5. 292 N.J. Super. 62 (1996)
 

HARLEY DAVIDSON v. ADVANCE DIE

292 N.J. Super. 62 (1996)

678 A.2d 293

HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ADVANCE DIE CASTING, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NORTHBROOK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John I. Lisowski argued the cause for appellant (Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, attorneys; Mr. Lisowski, of counsel, Robert G. Klinck and Steven F. Gooby, on the brief).

William R. Bumgardner argued the cause for respondent (Bumgardner, Hardin & Ellis, attorneys; Mr. Bumgardner, of counsel, Leona C. McFadden, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, A.M. STEIN and CUFF.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, P.J.A.D.

Harley Davidson Motor Company appeals from the dismissal of its indemnification suit against defendants Advance Die Casting, a component parts manufacturer, and its insurer, Northbrook Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Northbrook). The court's dismissal was based upon plaintiff's alleged failure to comply with the entire controversy doctrine. We reverse.

In an underlying action,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases