1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 185 Ariz.
  5. 185 Ariz. 165 (1996)
 

CALIFORNIA CAS. INS. v. STATE FARM MUT.

No. 1 CA-CV 94-0257.

185 Ariz. 165 (1996)

913 P.2d 505

CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A California corporation, Plaintiff, Counter-defendant-Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendant, Counter-claimant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

As Corrected February 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas & Burke, P.C. by Benjamin C. Thomas, David W. Davis, Phoenix, for Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant-Appellee.

Bell & O'Connor, P.C. by David M. Bell, Phoenix, for Defendant, Counter-claimant-Appellant.

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

Excess liability insurance carrier State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") appeals from summary judgment declaring that primary carrier California Casualty Insurance Company ("CalCasualty") was not required to reimburse State Farm for attorney's fees and costs it expended in defending a claim against the insured driver because CalCasualty had paid the full amount of its policy limits to a personal injury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases